MIFTAH
Monday, 1 July. 2024
 
Your Key to Palestine
The Palestinian Initiatives for The Promotoion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
 
 
 

On the November 2, President Mahmoud Abbas met with Hamas officials for the first time since their seizure of Gaza in June. Former deputy Prime Minister, Nassereddin al-Shaer and Hamas officials Faraj Rumana, Hussein Abu Qweik and Ayman Daraghmeh were amongst those invited for prayers with the president at the Muqata in Ramallah.

This meeting in the Muqata was the conclusion to a busy week of rhetoric exchanged between Hamas and Fatah. On the October 29, in an interview with Kuwaiti al Ra’i newspaper, President Abbas declared that Hamas intended on repeating their take over of Gaza in the West Bank. However, Abbas claimed that they would fail assuring that the supposedly controversial contacts between Hamas and Israel are not in fact new developments and therefore not a reason to worry.

In a rebuttal of Abbas’ words, a leading Hamas figure in Gaza, Nizar Rayyan, stated that Abbas would “fall like leaves of the tree” confidently asserting that Hamas would pray in the Muqata by next fall. PLC member, Mushir al-Masri, reiterated these words by saying that Abbas has no legitimacy or mandate from the Palestinian people. However, on Thursday November 1, West Bank Hamas officials, Faraj Rumana and Abu Qweik publicly announced that they rejected such statements as they “contradict with the policies of the movement”.

Whereas the meeting was positive in breeching the divide between the two functions, skepticism still circulates. Abbas stated that “Hamas is part of the Palestinian people” and Abu Qweik described Fatah and Hamas as “one entity” hoping that this meeting would prove to be the “prelude to dialogue”. This view is not shared by all as Hamas spokesperson, Sami Abu Zuhri said that the meeting “does not amount to dialogue”.

On Monday October 29, Ahmad Qurei, head of the Palestinian negotiating team, confirmed that there would be a Palestinian force deployed in Nablus within days. On the November 2, 308 officers from the training center in Jericho entered the second biggest city in the West Bank and erected checkpoints. Prime Minister Salam Fayyad reported that their job was “aimed at restoring the rule of law” with the “flashpoint” city of Nablus acting as a challenging test. Meanwhile Qurei hopes that the establishment of a specialized training center in Jericho would increase the future security of the West Bank and thus further the peace process with Israel.

Also on the November 2, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert revealed that he intends to reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians before President Bush leaves office in January 2009. The Israeli premier explained that “there are big advantages to reaching an agreement before the end of Bush’s term” as there is no telling how focused the new US president will be on the Palestinian / Israeli matter. Vice Premier, Haim Ramon, followed up the Prime Minister’s words by confirming that “immediately after Annapolis, when we begin to hold negotiations on a permanent agreement, certainly we will talk about Jerusalem, refugees, borders and Israel’s security”.

Despite these words, there has still been uncertainty this week concerning what the Annapolis Conference should entail. On the October 29, Ahmad Qurei once again reiterated that failures at the international meeting in the US could potentially be catastrophic. Qurei proclaimed that preventing this would involve the implementation of the first phase of the roadmap which includes ceasing violence on the Palestinian side and the halt of settlement activity on the Israeli side. On the same day, Nimer Hammad, political adviser to Abbas, blamed Israel for any failure that may result from Annapolis. Hammad deemed the Israeli newspapers which reported that Abbas and Olmert agreed not to discuss final status as false and instead stated that the negotiating teams are yet to reach a common ground. The presidential adviser concluded by asserting that “Israel still evades its responsibilities and does not want to agree on anything”.

Hammad’s sentiments were supported by King Abdullah on October 30 while he was visiting London. The Saudi Royal said that there is an absence of serious efforts being made and that the Fall Conference would subsequently fail if this wasn’t rectified.

On October 31, the Palestinian president voiced his demands for the Fall Conference. Abbas insisted that there be an implementation of UN Security Council resolutions, the Arab initiative and the roadmap which stipulates the establishment of the independent Palestinian state on 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital and the return of refugees. Abbas stressed that he would not expect anything less than this and expected a 6 month timeline be installed in order to discuss an agreement on all issues of final status. Head of the Palestinian negotiating team, Ahmad Qurei, warned that without a timetable and an agenda of clear priorities, there is no reason for the Palestinians to attend.

On the same day, the US State Department once again refused to sponsor the imposition of a timetable or final date for the Palestinian / Israeli negotiations without monitoring the progress the sides make over the next few weeks. The Department stressed their dedication to the cause but repeated their stance on fixing a set date, which is an opinion shared by Israel.

The debate over a set timetable was once again apparent on November 1. Following a meeting between Qurei and Israeli Foreign Minister, Tzipi Livni, Saeb Erekat of the Palestinian negotiating team added that are yet to draft the document but are instead brainstorming possibilities. Erekat also emphasized the importance of a timetable in order to ensure advances are made before President Bush leaves office.

Meanwhile the rival Conference organized by Hamas and set to take place in Damascus on November 7 has attracted caution and opposition. On October 29, the PLO sent envoys to Syria to convince them not to host the Conference, as they believe it will deepen the rift between Palestinians. Political adviser, Nimer Hammad, advised that the Damascus Conference would aid the Israeli cause rather than bolster the Palestinian one. Hammad continued by saying that it would not only act as highlighting divisions between Palestinians, it would portray them as being weak and would also reflect negatively on Syria as they would be seen as opposing the Arab Peace Agreement.

By October 31, the nine factions planning on sending representatives to the Damascus Conference announced that the committee of the Palestinian National Conference would postpone the meeting in the wake of the Annapolis Summit but would not abandon it. Hamas leader, Mahmoud Zahar, stated on November 1, that those meeting in Damascus would not succumb to the demands of Abbas who had insisted that the meeting be cancelled. It is believed that the Conference will be postponed until after Annapolis so that the parties can combat the events in the US Summit more effectively.

On October 29, Israel put their “fuel weapon” into operation. In the hope of deterring the military wings of Palestinian political groups from launching Qassam rockets into Israel, the Israeli government initiated their economic sanctions against the Gaza Strip by reducing the amount of fuel that enters the Strip. Nihro al-Hismawi, a Palestinian official for fuel at the Nahal Oz Crossing confirmed that Israel had secured 213,000 liters of benzene instead of the usual 350,000 liters. In addition, the European Committee reported that only 273,000 liters of solar were transported instead of 360,000 liters.

Three Palestinians died and twenty five were injured during a military incursion by the Israeli army in two operations north and east of Beit Hanoun on October 30. Furthermore, one Israeli soldier died and two were injured in clashes with Hamas south of the Gaza Strip on the same day. In the early morning of November 3, one Palestinian was killed and two were injured in the southern Gaza Strip by an Israeli air strike targeting an Executive Force post.

 
 
Read More...
 
Footer
Contact us
Rimawi Bldg, 3rd floor
14 Emil Touma Street,
Al Massayef, Ramallah
Postalcode P6058131

Mailing address:
P.O.Box 69647
Jerusalem
 
 
Palestine
972-2-298 9490/1
972-2-298 9492
info@miftah.org

 
All Rights Reserved © Copyright,MIFTAH 2023
Subscribe to MIFTAH's mailing list
* indicates required