MIFTAH
Monday, 1 July. 2024
 
Your Key to Palestine
The Palestinian Initiatives for The Promotoion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
 
 
 

Less than a week after the Middle East peace summit in Annapolis, Maryland came to a close, indications on the ground are hardly reflective of the positive words spoken on the Rose Garden lawn at its close. While the key leaders at the summit, US President George Bush, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert all praised the summit as a “good start” and an “opportunity that cannot be passed by”, it seems little efforts have been made to put those words into action.

On December 1, five Palestinians were killed in the dawn hours in the Gaza Strip town of Khan Younis. The five, all members of Hamas’ military wing, the Izzedin Al Qassam Brigades, were killed by six Israeli missiles shot over three stages. Unconfirmed media reports say some of the men were killed while administering first aid to the wounded.

These killings are preceded by a long string of others over the week, mainly in the Gaza Strip. On November 29, four men were killed, also in Khan Younis during an Israeli air raid and shelling in the area. One day earlier, two Palestinians died in another shelling to the same location, also members of the Izzedin Al Qassam Brigades.

Israel claims the raids were carried out in response to the continuous rocket firing by Palestinian groups into Israeli territory and has vowed not to end its attacks until the rockets stop.

On November 27, three other Palestinians died in the Gaza Strip, this time not by an Israeli missile raid but because they were denied exit from the Strip to seek medical treatment abroad. Israeli authorities have maintained a tight clamp down on the Strip for over five months, since Hamas forcefully overtook Gaza back in June.

On November 26, Israel killed another three Izzedin Al Qassam members in Gaza while a fourth member died of wounds sustained the previous day. A day earlier, on the 25th, two other Palestinians died in a gun battle with Israeli soldiers in the Strip while another Palestinian was killed in the West Bank city of Tulkarm. And on November 24, two brothers were killed in Beit Hanoun during Israeli shelling to the town. Another man from the West Bank village of Birzeit died of a massive heart attack during an Israeli invasion into the village.

In all, 22 Palestinians were killed this week as a result of Israeli military action in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. Palestinians so far have not felt any positive results from last week’s summit despite the pledges that were made there.

Israel has also seemed to take a step back from the commitments made in Annapolis. Even though Olmert agreed that bilateral talks would resume on December 12 between the Palestinians and Israelis, as per the joint statement resulting from the summit, on November 30, Israel apparently pressured the United States into reneging on a UN resolution binding the parties to just that. According to the Israeli daily Haaretz, the US withdrew a draft resolution endorsing the Israeli/Palestinian agreement to reach a final settlement by the end of 2008, which it initiated itself. Less than 24 hours after introducing the proposed resolution, the United States told the Security Council it was withdrawing it, apparently after Israel’s objection. Israeli officials said their government opposed the resolution because they deemed many of the UN Security Council’s member states “not friendly towards Israel.”

Palestinians, of course, see this move as Israel’s way of evading any binding obligations towards the agreement it made in Annapolis. Proof of this is a report, also released on November 30 and posted in Haaretz by Israeli lawyer Tali Sasson, who warned the government against approving an Israeli justice ministry proposal to allow state funds for settlement outposts. Sasson said the move would be clear violation of Olmert’s commitments to Bush on dismantling illegal outposts and halting settlement expansion.

Apparently, the ministry’s proposal, which is to be discussed in 10-days time, is aimed at cementing Jewish ownership of Palestinian land and offering legitimacy to these random and highly illegal outposts.

Furthermore, a batch of Palestinian prisoners, scheduled to be released on December 2, has been pushed back a day, for no apparent reason. The release of the 445 prisoners, mostly Fateh-affiliated, has suffered its second postponement, the first prior to the summit when Israel announced it was holding off on the release until after the parties returned from Annapolis.

These recent developments on the ground have put a damper on the already guarded optimism surrounding the conference. The United States dubbed the summit as a “success” given that the two parties were able to release a joint statement, but stressed that follow-up is key and that much effort is needed for its continued success.

President Abbas also expressed optimism about the prospects of the summit, voicing his positive attitude from the moment he touched down on US soil. “I am going to Annapolis to fulfill the goals and dreams of my people in establishing an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.”

Later on, on November 28, Abbas maintained his upbeat outlook, saying “Annapolis put the train back on the track towards establishing a Palestinian state.”

And while Olmert also followed suit, saying negotiations towards the establishment of a Palestinian state would start soon after the conference albeit amid major obstacles, he soon took his optimism down a notch a few days later when he stated on November 28 that the 2008 deadline “may not be possible.” Still, he conceded, “we have to start somewhere.”

Given their past experiences with Israel, the Palestinians also secured a guarantee to set up a trilateral Palestinian/Israeli/American committee to guarantee the implementation of the roadmap, which was included in the joint agreement.

Negotiations will ostensibly be carried out through six joint committees, which will deal with the core issues of refugees, Jerusalem, borders, settlements, water and security. Member of the negotiating committee Nabil Shaa’th also stressed that for these committees to actually make headway, Israel must accurately implement the roadmap along the way, namely halting settlement expansion, reopening Palestinian institutions in Jerusalem, removing checkpoints, lifting the siege and releasing prisoners.

Still, any high hopes for concrete results in Annapolis were dashed when the Palestinians and Israelis failed even to come out with a joint declaration. In its stead was the joint statement read by President Bush and which emphasized that the conference was not aimed at negotiations but at “starting” negotiations.

The core issues in question seem to be the “obstacles” Olmert was referring to, namely the refugee right of return and Jerusalem, which Israel insists will not be divided. However, an unnamed Palestinian negotiator was quoted in Haaretz as saying that Olmert agrees on principle to allow the Palestinians to administrate the Aqsa Mosque Compound jointly with Jordan and Egypt but has not yet found the right moment to inform his public. Olmert however, is seemingly breaking his people into the idea of a Palestinian state, telling them on November 30 that Israel would “be finished” if a two-state solution was not realized.

“If the day comes when the two-state solution collapses, and we face a South African-style struggle for equal voting rights (also for the Palestinians in the territories), then, as soon as that happens, the State of Israel is finished," he said.

What kind of “solution” Olmert has in mind for the Palestinians remains to be seen, but the Israeli leader is sure that any lack of solution may prove worse for his country in the long run.

In the end, the results of the three day long summit in which 44 countries participated, are still in their fledgling stage. The fact that 16 Arab countries, including Syria and Saudi Arabia attended, was seen as a positive step, both by the Palestinians who took it as a show of support for their cause, and by Israel who understood it as a willingness to accept them.

Syria, which only supposedly went to the conference after guarantees from the United States that the Golan Heights would be on the agenda, made it clear that it would only offer normal relations with Israel after all of the lands occupied in 1967 are returned to their owners. The Saudis also said that although the summit was positive, a timetable of no longer than one year should be set for negotiations to reap a solution.

So far, more meetings have been set up, namely a donor country meeting in Paris on December 27 and another meeting in Moscow at the start of the new year. Apparently donors are ready to dole out billions of dollars in aid to the Palestinians, at least according to Quartet Committee Envoy Tony Blair on November 28. The aid, he said, would go to funding economic and infrastructure projects in the Palestinian territories, which would create thousands of new job opportunities.

Still, one international personality put everything back in perspective. Deputy Commissioner-General of UNRWA, Karen Abu Zayd said on November 28 that any peace process excluding Hamas could never be implemented on the ground.

 
 
Read More...
 
Footer
Contact us
Rimawi Bldg, 3rd floor
14 Emil Touma Street,
Al Massayef, Ramallah
Postalcode P6058131

Mailing address:
P.O.Box 69647
Jerusalem
 
 
Palestine
972-2-298 9490/1
972-2-298 9492
info@miftah.org

 
All Rights Reserved © Copyright,MIFTAH 2023
Subscribe to MIFTAH's mailing list
* indicates required