MIFTAH
Monday, 1 July. 2024
 
Your Key to Palestine
The Palestinian Initiatives for The Promotoion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
 
 
 

On March 14, Lt. General William Fraser III met with Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and Amos Gilad [a member of the Israeli Defense ministry] at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem to discuss the current state of the peace process. Since his appointment after Annapolis over three months ago, Lt. General Fraser has taken a somewhat laissez-faire approach to the process, leaving the Palestinians and Israelis to resolve matters on their own. However, with the recent resumption of violence, failed peace initiatives and violations of the roadmap, Lt. General Fraser has decided to intervene.

Lt. General Fraser declared that “we examined areas where the parties are not meeting their commitments” reiterating the opinions of US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice who commented that “without following roadmap obligations and without improvements on the ground, it is very hard to sustain the process”.

On March 9, Israeli Housing Minister Zeev Boim confirmed that Israel will expand the Givat Zeev settlement, eight kilometers north of Jerusalem by 350 units while adding a further 750 housing units to the Pisgat Zeev settlement in east Jerusalem. Salam Fayyad emphasized at the meeting how a “freeze on settlement expansion is crucial to preserving the possibility of a Palestinian state”. Under stage one of the roadmap, Israel is obligated to seize all settlement expansion, however, misinterpretations of this prerequisite have led to widespread confusion. Israel maintains that east Jerusalem, the area Palestinians want to be the capital of their future state, is not to be included in this arrangement whereas Palestinians take the clause to encompass all settlements. In addition, Zeev Boim stressed that the permits for these housing units were issued almost a decade ago and were only suspended with the economic problems stemming from the outbreak of the al-Aqsa Intifada in 2000 and therefore were agreed long before Annapolis occurred. The US has labeled this move from Israel “unhelpful” within the context of reaching a peace agreement – a view shared by much of the international community.

One notable absentee of the meeting was Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. By sending a subordinate to the meeting in Amos Gilad, it seems as if Israel was diminishing the importance of the discussion. Israeli officials stated that Barak was never scheduled to take part in the meeting while Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat frustratingly asserted that the Israeli Defense Minister was probably “busy planning more settlement construction and more incursions”.

The meeting between the US Lt. General, Salam Fayyad and Amos Gilad came just two days after violence escalated between Palestinians and Israelis after a three day period of calm.

On March 12, Israeli forces drove into Bethlehem killing four Palestinian activists. The raid targeted local Islamic Jihad leader Mohammed Shahada [48] who had been wanted for eight years for his operations against Israel. Islamic Jihad members Imad al-Kamel and Eissa Marzuk were also killed in the incursion, as was Ahmed al-Babul [48], a member of al-Aqsa Brigades - the group loosely linked with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fateh party. On March 13, 50,000 people attended the funeral of the dead at Manger Square in Bethlehem and watched as the bodies were carried with their coffins draped in Hizbollah flags, the Shiite Lebanese resistance group which has a long affiliation with Islamic Jihad.

Speaking about the raid in Bethlehem, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak declared that the incident was an example of how Israel is dedicated to “pursue and hit all assassins with blood on their hands. No matter how much time has passed, Israel will be waiting for them”.

Israel was thought to be honoring the mutual cessation of violence while talks were taking place between Hamas and Egypt. On March 11, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine [PFLP] fired a rocket which hit Ashkelon [11 kilometers north of Gaza], causing no injury but struck just hours after Prime Minister Olmert had visited the town. Israeli officials said that despite the attack they would restrain themselves and avoid reverting back to the conditions of a couple of weeks ago when 130 Palestinians and five Israelis were killed.

Therefore, confusion ensued as to the nature of the attack in Bethlehem and why Israel would risk the period of calm or hinder the talks between Hamas and Egypt, simply to “settle an old score” as Israeli legislator Tzahi Hanegbi from the prime minister’s Kadima party put it. Many questioned this Israeli decision believing that Israel must have known it would attract some degree of retribution.

The response came almost immediately. Islamic Jihad members in Gaza launched 24 rockets into Israel on the evening of March 12 and during March 13. The attack was the first by the faction since March 5 with no injuries reported. In reprisal for the rocket attacks, Israel struck Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza on March 13 attempting to destroy popular launching destinations in the area.

The Israeli attacks on Palestinian targets were condemned by the 57 members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference [OIC] who gathered in the Senegalese capital of Dakar on March 13 and 14. The group, which met to highlight the “war crimes” committed by Israel, also aimed to address ways of curing the “Islamophobia” felt by the West. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, adopting a stiff stance on the issue, publicly announced that “our people in Jerusalem are under an ethnic cleansing campaign”, continuing that the recent “barbaric crimes reveal the true face of Israel which speaks loudly of peace and security while committing murders and executions against our people”. The host of the conference, Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade, underlined the need for unity between Palestinian factions as a “priority” for success.

President Abbas had projected a more positive message on March 10 in reference to the talks between Hamas and Egypt, which were established to try and negotiate a ceasefire between Hamas and Israel. While meeting King Abdullah in Jordan, President Abbas hinted that an agreement may be reached soon concerning Hamas and Israel. In stark contrast to the president’s words, Israeli cabinet ministers downplayed the event with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert later exclaiming that “there is no deal, there are no negotiations either direct or indirect”.

On March 12, deposed Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh offered Israel a Tahdi’a – a period of calm. He proclaimed that Israel must “stop the aggression…including assassinations and incursions, end the sanctions and open the borders” concluding that the “ball is in Israel’s court”.

However, Israel rejected the proposal claiming that a Tahdi’a fell short of what Israel expects. According to Israel, a Tahdi'a is a state of relations more open to interpretation than a Hudna – a truce previously advocated by Hamas. Israel maintains that by using the term Tahdi’a, Hamas would be alleviating itself from responsibility in enforcing a halt on rocket attacks, while a hudna implies a more substantial and credible move towards recognizing Israel.

Contrary to Haniyeh’s comments, Israeli spokesperson Mark Regev expressed the complete opposite by saying that the onus is on Hamas. The spokesperson repeated that if Hamas wants to experience calm in Gaza, they must stop the rockets being fired into Israel. Mark Regev went further by confirming that Israel “will not allow Hamas to sub- contract out terrorism” but will subsequently blame Hamas for every rocket that is launched from Gaza, even if they are fired by other Palestinian factions.

With Israel’s disregard for roadmap obligations concerning settlement expansion and with the breakdown of a possible agreement between Hamas and Israel, there are fears that the violence will escalate further and thus prove more damaging for the peace process.

Hamas spokesperson Sami Abu Zuhri told reporters that there is “no meaning to any ceasefire in the midst of these crimes…this crime demands a response from the resistance”. On March 14, another Hamas spokesperson, Abu Obeida, declared that al-Qassam Brigades [Hamas’ military wing] had shot an Israeli helicopter with the “improving ammunitions and more accurate weapons the fighters obtain”, reaffirming Israeli fears that Hamas may have acquired more effective arms from Egypt when the Rafah border crossing was forced open for almost two weeks in January.

Meanwhile, some Israeli officials share the same cynicism regarding a future agreement. An unnamed source told the Israeli paper Ha’aretz that “if there are no steps on the ground we will find ourselves in big trouble”.

In other news, Israeli deputy of Foreign Affairs Mjalli Wahbeh has expressed his reservations to Qatari authorities concerning the political stance of the news station Al-Jazeera. Israel has accused the Qatar-based [and mostly owned] news channel of favoring Hamas and sympathizing with their cause, threatening to refuse entry to Israel for their employees if the complaint is not sufficiently dealt with. Similarly, Majed Abu Baker, a lawmaker for President Abbas’ Fateh party, has also announced his dissatisfaction with Al-Jazeera claiming that their coverage is “unfair” and guilty of “spreading radical Islam”. Conversely, Hamas leaders Ismail Haniyeh and Mahmoud Zahar have praised Al- Jazeera for their work and stressed that any action taken against the channel would be a violation of their right to free speech.

The German Foreign Ministry has revealed that they will host an international conference in Berlin to amalgamate support for and offer advice to the Palestinian police and judiciary to improve their efficiency and effectiveness.

Lastly, US Vice-President Dick Cheney has departed from the US and is to embark on a tour of Oman, Saudi Arabia, the West Bank, Israel and Turkey to demonstrate and reinforce America’s commitment to promoting peace in the Middle East. The vice-president will also use this trip as an opportunity to discuss the rising oil prices.

 
 
Read More...
 
Footer
Contact us
Rimawi Bldg, 3rd floor
14 Emil Touma Street,
Al Massayef, Ramallah
Postalcode P6058131

Mailing address:
P.O.Box 69647
Jerusalem
 
 
Palestine
972-2-298 9490/1
972-2-298 9492
info@miftah.org

 
All Rights Reserved © Copyright,MIFTAH 2023
Subscribe to MIFTAH's mailing list
* indicates required