MIFTAH
Sunday, 30 June. 2024
 
Your Key to Palestine
The Palestinian Initiatives for The Promotoion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
 
 
 

President Mahmoud Abbas addressed the UN General Assembly on September 23, surprising many with the power and strength of his message. First the president outlined the ills of the negotiating process that had led to a dead end and a multiplication of Jewish settlements on Palestinian land, saying it was long overdue for Palestine to enjoy independence.

“The core issue here is that the Israeli government refuses to commit to terms of reference for the negotiations that are based on international law and United Nations resolutions, and that it frantically continues to intensify building of settlements on the territory of the State of Palestine,” he said.

Still, he reminded the audience, Palestinians had already made their historical concession long ago. “Because we believe in peace and because of our conviction in international legitimacy, and because we had the courage to make difficult decisions for our people, and in the absence of absolute justice, we decided to adopt the path of relative justice – justice that is possible and could correct part of the grave historical injustice committed against our people,” in reference to the PLO decision to adopt the two-state solution.

After an impassioned speech in which he received ovations – some of them standing – Abbas said what he had come to say. Despite immense pressure from the United States, some European states and even certain Arab states, he announced that he, as president of Palestine and chairman of the PLO, had handed a request for full membership for Palestine into the UN to Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon.

Addressing the delegates, he said, "Your support for the recognition of the state of Palestine is the greatest contribution to the state of peace in the region. I hope we shall not have to wait for long."

The euphoria of Abbas’ speech spilled into the streets of the West Bank as thousands of Palestinians waved flags and pictures of the president. A few hours later, however, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took the podium and repeated his old argument of Israel’s security against the dangers surrounding the “tiny country.” Still, he insisted, Israel’s hand was extended to its neighbors.

“The truth is that Israel wants peace, the truth is that I want peace," Netanyahu said, adding that "we cannot achieve peace through UN resolutions," parroting US President Obama’s position in his own UN address days earlier.

"The Palestinians should first make peace with Israel and then get their state," he said, adding that it was “time for the Palestinians to acknowledge that Israel is the Jewish state."

Netanyahu isn’t fooling everyone, though. Even before his UN address, on September 20, former US President Bill Clinton expressed his wariness of Israel’s intention to make peace.

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is responsible for the inability to reach a peace deal that would end the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians,” he said on the sidelines of the Clinton Global Initiative conference in New York. In a Foreign Policy piece, Clinton claimed Netanyahu lost interest in the peace process as soon as two basic Israeli demands seemed to come into reach: a viable Palestinian leadership and the possibility of normalizing ties with the Arab world. “The Israelis always wanted two things that once it turned out they had, it didn't seem so appealing to Mr. Netanyahu," Clinton said.

On September 18 another former US President Jimmy Carter said the Palestinians should continue full steam ahead. “The Palestinians might regret if they don’t seek to achieve recognition of their state. The Palestinians can live without the US assistance,” he said in reference to a US threat to cut aid to the PA if the bid goes through.

The fact that Abbas did not heed the immense pressure on him to backtrack in his UN bid has irked the United States just as much as Israel. For months, the US has been warning the Palestinians not to resort to the UN for statehood, hinting at possible consequences if they did. US President Barack Obama addressed the UNGA on September 20, during which he left no question as to the US position.

“Peace is hard work. Peace will not come through statements and resolutions at the United Nations,” he said. “Ultimately, it is the Israelis and the Palestinians who must live side by side. Ultimately, it is the Israelis and the Palestinians — not us –- who must reach agreement on the issues that divide them.”

While Obama said the US did “seek a future where Palestinians live in a sovereign state of their own”, he was sure to reiterate the US commitment to Israel. “America’s commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable. Our friendship with Israel is deep and enduring. And so we believe that any lasting peace must acknowledge the very real security concerns that Israel faces every single day.” Obama went on in what was deemed as one of his most pro-Israel speeches to date.

“Israel is surrounded by neighbors that have waged repeated wars against it. Israel’s citizens have been killed by rockets fired at their houses and suicide bombs on their buses. Israel’s children come of age knowing that throughout the region, other children are taught to hate them…”

A day later, on September 21, Obama spelled it out plain and clear, telling Abbas that the United States would veto any Security Council move to recognize Palestinian statehood.

"We would have to oppose any action at the UN Security Council including, if necessary, vetoing," White House national security council spokesman Ben Rhodes told reporters after Obama met Abbas.

The Palestinians of course, were deeply disappointed in the speech. Mohammed Shtayyeh, Fatah Central Committee member, said Obama’s address was unbalanced and offered nothing new. “The speech of Obama gave a historical right for the Jews in Palestine while the Palestinian version of the story was not mentioned at all,” he said. “I believe that Obama’s speech was a speech prepared for elections in the US.”

Ahmad Al Tibi, Palestinian-Arab Knesset member, said Obama adopted the Israeli narrative in this speech and disregarded Palestinian suffering. “Obama lost many points with the Arab world and his moral status has been shaken.”

PLO Executive Committee member Hanan Ashrawi was even more to the point. In an interview with Haaretz she said she was very disappointed with Obama's speech. "Listening to [Obama], you would think it was the Palestinians who occupy Israel," she said.

"He presented a double standard when he disassociated the Arabs' fight for their freedom in the region from the Palestinian freedom fighters, who deal with the occupation for 63 years… what we heard is precisely why we are going to the UN."

Not all Palestinians were on board though with the PLO’s bid for statehood. On September 23, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said his movement rejected the statehood bid as “unworthy.”

"States are not built upon UN resolutions. States liberate their land and establish their entities."

For now, it remains to be seen how the cards will fall. The Quartet and France’s Nicolas Sarkozy have both put forth potential plans to get negotiations back on track. During his UN address on September 21, Sarkozy proposed accepting Palestine as an observer state and a one-year timetable for negotiations to reach a final peace agreement in the region.

On September 24, the Quartet called for the Palestinians and Israel to resume direct peace talks within a month and commit to seeking a deal by the end of 2012.

“We urge both parties to take advantage of this opportunity to get back to talks," US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters after talks with her Quartet partners on the sidelines of the General Assembly. PLO official Saeb Erakat said the PLO was "ready to assume our responsibilities".

"But Israel needs to assume its own and end settlement activity", he added.

Speaking of settlements, the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Campaign scored a victory on September 22 by closing down the Avaha supplier in London after two years of protests.

Ahava has its main headquarters in the illegal Israeli settlement of Mitzpe Shalem; its products are imported from the Dead Sea, which Israel has blockaded from Palestinians since 2000 in contravention of the Dead Sea Agreements. The store incurred heavy losses because of the bi-weekly protests in the posh neighborhood of Covent Garden and eventually had to shut its doors.

Meanwhile, Israeli occupation forces killed 33-year old Issam Odeh on September 23 during an Israeli army raid into Qusra, a Nablus-area village. Odeh died after being shot by two bullets in the neck and shoulders during confrontations after morning prayers.

On September 22, the Israeli army raided the villages of Al Araqa and Bourqeen and two homes east of Bethlehem. Settlers also burned agricultural lands in Der Jreer and destroyed 60 olive trees in Madama.

 
 
Read More...
 
Footer
Contact us
Rimawi Bldg, 3rd floor
14 Emil Touma Street,
Al Massayef, Ramallah
Postalcode P6058131

Mailing address:
P.O.Box 69647
Jerusalem
 
 
Palestine
972-2-298 9490/1
972-2-298 9492
info@miftah.org

 
All Rights Reserved © Copyright,MIFTAH 2023
Subscribe to MIFTAH's mailing list
* indicates required