MIFTAH
Monday, 1 July. 2024
 
Your Key to Palestine
The Palestinian Initiatives for The Promotoion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
 
 
 

Significant Opinion results

  • Political affiliation and religious grounds, as bases for choice of candidates in the upcoming PLC elections, rose (32.6%, 14.5% respectively compared with 27.7% and 10.0% in May 2005) at the expense of personal competence which decreased from 58.3% in May 2005 to 45.2% in December 2005.
  • There remains a considerable majority of Palestinians (68.2%) who want to participate in the upcoming PLC elections although the ratio was higher in May 2005 (75.1%).
  • The majority of the Palestinians expect the upcoming PLC elections to be honest (52.7%) while 39.9% expect the elections to be dishonest.
  • The poll shows there is a slight increase in general optimism towards the future reaching 68% in December 2005 compared with 61.3% last May.
  • With regards to the Palestinian figure trusted most by the Palestinian public, Mahmoud Abbas “Abu Mazin” remains the top figure with a ratio of 15.5% compared with 24.8% in May 2005. Marwan Barghouthi got the second ranking with a ratio of 7.8%. Mahmoud Zahhar and Mohammed Dahlan got the third rank with a ratio of 5.8% each. A considerable ratio of 31.1% of Palestinians continues not to trust any figure.
  • A considerable ratio of Palestinians (45.1%) believe that the economic conditions since Abu Mazin became President of the PNA has not changed and a ratio of 30.8% of Palestinians said the economic conditions got worse during the same period.
  • A significant majority of Palestinians (73.1%) believe Hamas decision to participate in the upcoming PLC elections is a positive step and (61.3%) believe that if Hamas becomes part of the PLC, it will abide by the decisions taken by the majority of the PLC members.
  • The poll shows that a ratio of 40.2% of the Palestinians believe the third party or path along side Fatah and Hamas must be from independent figures while 26.4% say there is no need for a third party.
  • With regards to the political situation of the Palestinian people since Abu Mazin assumed office, a ratio of 50.5% said the situation remained the same while those who believe the situation got worse rose from 13.1% in May 2005 to 22.2% this December.
  • On the reasons for the recent increase in security chaos incidents, a ratio of 41.5% say the poor performance of the PA and its security services is the main reason while 33.1% say the reason is because some groups exploit the political situation to evade the law and order.

Positions regarding the next PLC elections:

There is a slight decrease in ratio of Palestinians who want to participate in the next PLC elections from (75.1%) in May 2005 to (68.2%) in December 2005.

The educational qualification, democracy awareness and reputation emerged as the three most important factors that will influence the voter in the next PLC elections. A ratio of (91.5%) of Palestinians said the educational qualification of the candidate is very important or important when they choose their representative in the next parliament while (90.5%) said democracy awareness of the candidate is very important or important. A ratio of (89.3%) said the reputation of the candidate is a very important or important factor that will influence the voting. Religious grounds come in fourth place with a ratio of 83%.

A ratio of 58.3% of Palestinians said they have made up their mind on whom to vote for in their constituency while 39.5% said they are still undecided.

When asked if the elections programs are based on secular trends versus fundamentalist trends, the highest ratio of Palestinians (46.0%) said they will choose the fundamentalist trends while (37.5%) said they will choose the secular trends. However, a ratio of 60.3% said they will choose the PLO’s political program while 27.8% of Palestinians said they will vote for the opposition’s political program.

When asked if they would vote for a candidate who is not from the faction or party they trust most, a ratio of 52.3% said they would vote for such a candidate while 41.4% said they would not.

When asked which is the better method to choose Fatah candidates to the PLC elections, a ratio of 45.5% of the Palestinians said the choice should come from within the bases of Fatah Movement while 29.7% said Fatah Central Committee should decide on the names of candidates to run in the PLC elections.

Trust in Figures and Factions:

In JMCC open ended trend question about the Palestinian figure they trust most, Mahmoud Abbas got the highest level of support (15.5%) among Palestinians which shows a slight decline when compared with (24.8%) in May 2005 and with (26.2%) in December 2004. Marwan Barghouthi maintained the second rank with (7.8%). Mahmoud Zahhar came in third place with (5.8%). Mohammed Dahlan also got 5.8% in general but received 13.9% in Gaza Strip. The highest ratio (31.1%) of Palestinians continues showing no trust in any figure.

The Poll results show that Fatah maintained a steady level of popularity (38.9%) compared with 36.1% last May. The Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, continues to be the second force in terms of popularity among Palestinians (18.5%) compared with (19.8%) last May.

Performance of the Executive and Legislative Authorities:

When asked about the performance of Abu Mazen as President of the PNA, the majority of Palestinians (50.3%) ranked his performance as average while 28.7% said his performance is good compared with 23.8% last May. However, when asked if Abu Mazin succeeded in achieving his election campaign programs on enforcing order and the rule of the law, the higher ratio of (44.8%) said he succeeded to a certain extent while (30.9%) said he succeeded to a low extent and 13.9% said he didn’t succeed at all.

When asked about the performance of the PLC, a ratio of 66.4% ranked it as either average or bad while only 14.8% said the PLC performance is good. On the performance of the government of Qurei’, a ratio of 30.1% ranked its performance as very good and good while a ratio of 33.1% ranked it as average and 32.8% ranked it as bad or very bad..

On the performance of the PNA, a majority of (53.4%) said the performance is either very good or good compared with 43.0% last June while (44.4%) said the PNA performance is either bad or very bad.

When asked to assess the level of progress or retreat in the reform process in various fields, reform in the civil service system achieved the best results with a ratio of 44.0% saying it witnessed progress while 31.8% said no change has happened in this field. Reform in the security service system got the lowest points as 35.9% said it witnessed retreat and 33.4% said there has been no change in this area. Rule of the law showed almost same results: a ratio of 38.0% said they witnessed no change in this area while 36.4% said this area witnessed retreat.

The peace process:

There seems to be a rising trend in level of optimism among the Palestinians with regards to the future in general. The majority of the Palestinians (68.0%) are either very optimistic or optimistic compared with (61.3%) in May 2005 and (59.3%) in December 2004.

A majority of Palestinians (55.1%) support the two state solution as the favored solution of the Israeli – Palestinian conflict while a ratio of (20.3%) believe a bi-national state on all of historic Palestine is the preferred solution. A ratio of (10.9%) say one Palestine state is the favored solution.

Methodology

A random sample of 1199 people over the age of 18 was interviewed face-to-face throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip between 5th and 9th, of December 2005. The interviews were conducted in randomly selected homes, and the subjects inside each home were also selected randomly according to Kish tables. The interviews were conducted in 60 sampling points chosen randomly according to population.

In the West Bank 759 people were surveyed from the following areas: Jenin: Jenin, Jenin Refugee Camp (RC), Tubas, Silat al- Harthia, Sanour, Jaba'a, Arabeh, Fahmeh al- Qadeimeh. Nablus: Nablus, Hiwara, A'in Abous, Salfit, Beit Dajan, 'Askar RC, Qouseen, Beit Iba. Tulkarem and Qalqilya: Tulkarem, ‘Tulkarem RC, Ateel, 'Anabta, Qalqilia. Hebron: Hebron, Bani Na'im, Dura, Beit Ummar, Aroub RC, Beit Ula, Kurza. Bethlehem: Bethlehem, Nahaleen, a-Duha, Hindaza, Azza RC. Ramallah & al-Bireh: Beitunia, Al Bireh, Deir Ghasaneh, Deir Jreer, Kharbatha Bani Harith, al- 'Amari RC. Jericho, Jericho, Ain Sultan RC. Jerusalem: Izzaria, Abu Dees, Beit Surik, Qalandia RC, Shufat, Old City, Beit Hanina, Beit Hanina a-tahta, al- 'Issawia, Wadi al – Joz., Jabal Al Mukaber.

In the Gaza Strip: 440 people were surveyed from: Gaza: Shati RC, a- Shuja'ia, Attufah, al-Durj, Sheikh Radwan, a- Nasser, a-rimal a-Shamali, a-rimal al-janoubi, Sabra, a-Zeiton. Khan Younis: Absan al- Saghira, Khan Younis, Bani Suheila, Abasan al-Kabira, Khan Younis RC. Rafah: Rafah, Tal al- Sultan RC, Rafah RC. Gaza North: Jabalia, Beit Lahia, Jabalia RC, Beit Hanoun. Deir al-Balah: Deir Al – Balah, Nusseirat RC, Al –Maghazi RC.

The margin of error is 3 percent, with a confidence level of 95.

To View the Full Result as PDF (212 KB)

 
 
Read More...
 
 
By the Same Author
 
Footer
Contact us
Rimawi Bldg, 3rd floor
14 Emil Touma Street,
Al Massayef, Ramallah
Postalcode P6058131

Mailing address:
P.O.Box 69647
Jerusalem
 
 
Palestine
972-2-298 9490/1
972-2-298 9492
info@miftah.org

 
All Rights Reserved © Copyright,MIFTAH 2023
Subscribe to MIFTAH's mailing list
* indicates required