MIFTAH
Monday, 1 July. 2024
 
Your Key to Palestine
The Palestinian Initiatives for The Promotoion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
 
 
 

Today, US President George W. Bush arrived in Israel for Israel’s 60th Independence Day celebrations. Israel has taken all the necessary precautions and elaborate measures to receive the president, including imposing a “closure” on the West Bank, banning Palestinians from entering Jerusalem or Israel while the president is here.

The US President will partake in Israel’s “Facing Tomorrow” presidential conference along with several other world leaders including former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Approximately 80 Jewish leaders from around the world will also travel to Israel to show their support.

The fact that Bush is taking part in Israel’s independence celebrations is really no surprise. The United States has always been Israel’s strongest and most loyal ally and has never made a secret of its bias towards it. Over and above this general overview, there is the additional perk of George Bush’s personal affection for Israel. This staunch Republican does not candy-coat his positions, not only in the Israel-Palestine conflict but worldwide. We all painfully remember Bush post-September 11 when he addressed his nation – which essentially meant the world – and issued a treacherous warning. “You are either with us or against us in the fight against terror.”

This single phrase ushered in a new and perilous era where the world was split down the middle between those who agreed and followed in Bush’s Texan cowboy footsteps or those less fortunate who found themselves on the other side of his lasso. As history will bear witness to, the Palestinians could not escape the noose and have been fighting a defensive war ever since.

Seven years later, Bush has hardly changed his mind about the Palestinians or about Israel for that matter. In an interview with the Israeli daily Haaretz on May 12, the US President says, “The interesting thing that's happened during my presidency is twofold: One, there's been clarity for people to see the world the way it really is -- a failed leadership of Hamas in Gaza, for example, or the true aims of these extremist killers -- plus the emergence of thought in Israel that the only way to exist in the long term is for there to be a Palestinian state.”

Given Bush’s track record in Afghanistan and Iraq, his description of Hamas is hardly shocking. What is shocking, however, is how many Palestinians continue to look to the United States for a solution to their problem. It is also surprising that the US still insists on its self-description as an “honest” broker in resolving this conflict.

So as not to delve too deep into detail over the many instances of American bias towards Israel, let us confine this argument to the occasion at hand. As Bush exults in the 60th anniversary of the establishment of Israel alongside its leaders, the history of an entire people, whose best interests Bush claims to have at heart, is being denied.

It is a well known fact that Israel was established at the expense of the Palestinians. Al Nakba, which the Palestinians commemorate in tandem with Israel’s independence, is a reminder that the conflict is far from a resolution. President Bush is in Israel, he will address the Knesset but he will surely not pay homage to the 800,000 Palestinians who lost their homes in 1948, never to return again. He will visit historical Israeli sites, but he will not travel to the ruins of a Palestinian village inside Israel, destroyed along with 400 or so others when the Jewish state was created. Bush will laud Israeli leaders on their achievements but will not chide them for displacing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians and forcing them into exile.

Above all, President Bush will not accept the inalienable right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. The right of return, which Palestinians, along with an international endorsement in the form of UN Resolution 194, continue to insist on, is one that Israel and the United States have denied ever since the refugee problem came into being. This has always been one of the toughest bones of contention between Palestinians and Israelis and will most likely remain so for many years to come. Israel will never jeopardize its Jewish character by allowing Palestinians back into Israel, even if this means the denial of their right of return could push back a final solution to the conflict indefinitely.

Hence, how much should our leadership really rely on the United States to help reach a settlement to the conflict knowing that the scales are terribly tipped in Israel’s favor? On the one hand, it is understandable that the Palestinian leadership looks to the United States for a role in peacemaking if for no other reason than because it is unarguably the most powerful country in the world. Without its involvement, Israel will have even less of a reason to sit at the negotiating table with the Palestinians.

On the other hand, however, the Palestinians, leadership and people to a large extent, have put too many of their eggs in the red-white-and-blue basket. A little perspective is in order. The United States has proven that its brokering is less than “honest” time and again. We only need to look back at the Declaration of Principles [the Oslo Accords] and the Roadmap to see how far this honest brokering has gotten us. We have only to remember the ill-fated Camp David summit in July 2000 to realize that the United States may want to see peace prevail in Palestine but not for the same reasons as the Palestinians. For the United States, it has and always will be about protecting the interests of its closest ally in the region, which by association, means US interests as well.

For the Palestinians, a resolution to this decades-long conflict is about something else. Palestinians want peace just like any other nation in the world. However, the peace coveted by the Palestinian people has its basis in rights not in the other’s security. Certain rights, such as the right of return, are inherent, not up for compromise and timeless. Its importance does not diminish with the passing of time nor can it be swept under the carpet of alternative proposals, land swaps or large sums of money.

On this occasion, self-reflection is necessary. First and foremost, the Palestinians need to get their house in order so they have one voice, one stance, at the negotiating table. After that, the leadership needs to rethink its priorities. It is clear in this day and age that the United States cannot be obliterated from the “peacemaking” efforts in the region. However, it is also clear that President Bush, [Secretary of State] Condoleezza Rice or anyone else frequenting the oval office will never be the parties to ensure justice for the Palestinians. Could they offer a truncated agreement that serves Israel’s interests first? Perhaps. But a just, lasting and comprehensive peace that ensures the full rights of the Palestinians? Not likely.

So, as Bush celebrates Israel’s 60th birthday without so much as a nod to the historical injustice that lies just below its surface, his own words ring true. Let us, “see the world the way it really is” – a biased America will never bring justice to the Palestinians. That is a delusion that has been kept alive far too long.

Joharah Baker is a Writer for the Media and Information Programme at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mip@miftah.org.

 
 
Read More...
 
 
By the Same Author
 
Footer
Contact us
Rimawi Bldg, 3rd floor
14 Emil Touma Street,
Al Massayef, Ramallah
Postalcode P6058131

Mailing address:
P.O.Box 69647
Jerusalem
 
 
Palestine
972-2-298 9490/1
972-2-298 9492
info@miftah.org

 
All Rights Reserved © Copyright,MIFTAH 2023
Subscribe to MIFTAH's mailing list
* indicates required