President Bush’s ‘strategist’ on the Middle East conflict, Elliot Abrams, has made some controversial statements to a gathering of scholars and Jewish leaders in which he stated that Jewish settlements outside the Wall will have to be dismantled. By making such a statement Abrams, in other words, is implying that Israel will be allowed to keep the illegal settlements built on Palestinian land, occupied in 1967 in breach of international law. This statement also recognizes the Wall as the future borders between the two states which are seeking peaceful co-existence through a deal agreed upon by both sides.
Ironically, this very controversial statement which further manipulates and skews international law and expectations has angered Israelis, since it implies that Israeli armed fanatics, also known as settlers, will have to dismantle the illegal structures and move from settlements built on the ‘Palestinian’, i.e. eastern side of the Wall. Palestinians on the other hand felt that this is not enough, since all settlements built on occupied land are illegal, and so is the Wall, which snakes through Palestinian-owned land and annexes 42% of the 22% of historic Palestine, which is the area occupied in 1967 and desired as the future Palestinian state and the basis for UN resolutions and a negotiated peace.
This arrogant approach in which the thief (Israel) has the upper hand and is dictating to the victim (occupied Palestinians) what he/she will give back, and that it is better than nothing, is a disastrous approach which not only insults the intelligence of peace-loving Palestinians and Israelis. It also undermines and disrespects the previous and current leaders of the world, international will and laws in general, and the USA in particular, which historically had a good understanding on the issue of occupation and the legality of settlements and other structures built on occupied land.
Edward Abington, former consul general in Jerusalem, phrased it well when he explained that “the statement that all settlements should be dismantled is an important clarification, […] it makes it less one-sided.” Unfortunately, advice from former consul generals, who served in Jerusalem and recognize the grave injustice which has been blindly supported by the ‘mediator’ (USA), is often ignored and rarely ever mentioned again.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled on the Wall and decided that “the construction of the wall, and its associated regime, are contrary to international law” (para. 142), explaining that the Wall “severely impedes the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self-determination” (para. 122). Further, the Court unanimously ruled that the West Bank, including east Jerusalem, is occupied territory: “The territories situated between the Green Line and the former eastern boundary under the Mandate of Palestine were occupied by Israel in 1967…All these territories (including east Jerusalem) remain occupied territories and Israel has continued to have the status of an occupying Power” (para. 78).
Israel claims that this Wall is temporary and that it will be dismantled, so while Israelis would not dare claim the Wall as borders, an official American strategist is doing that job for them. The ICJ did address this issue and was firm when stating that: “Whilst the court notes the assurances given by Israel that the construction of the wall does not amount to annexation and the wall is of a temporary nature, it nevertheless cannot remain indifferent to certain fears expressed to it that the wall and its associated regime create a ‘fait accompli’ on the ground that well could become permanent, in which case, and notwithstanding the formal characterization of the wall by Israel, it would be tantamount to de facto annexation” (para. 121).
The “fears” mentioned in the ruling are turning into facts with American politicians – many of whom are on AIPAC’s (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) payroll – taking the initiative in order to aid and abet a state above the law, a state which has destabilized the region with its occupation and left many mocking its blind ally, America, and its so-called democracy; for they know them from their actions.
Democracy as understood by the average human being is justice. It is equal opportunity and the indiscriminate implementation of the rules of humanity – the law. The USA is giving democracy, which is a noble and great idea in theory, a very bad name. America has been anything but an advocate of justice. On the contrary, it has cemented racism and hate towards countries and religions in the region simply because of lack of understanding or the lack of the will to stand strong in the face of injustice, and perhaps also for some additional reasons which are not the subject of this comment.
There is nothing brave about standing with the strong (the oppressor). America today might have the monetary and ‘liberty’ advantages, but it has lost respect for the average person in this day’s world. To earn the respect of an oppressed region, which has been at the receiving end of a grave injustice; America should dig back to its principled roots and seek the ‘honorable advantage’ which is based on humanity, equality and justice for all.
Believing in Jerusalem
Date posted: May 27, 2013
By Joharah Baker for MIFTAH
Last week, Israel barred a UNESCO fact-finding mission from entering the country, charging that the Palestinians had ‘politicized’ the mission before it had even arrived. The mission was tasked with looking into conditions of historical sites in the Old City of Jerusalem, something Israel apparently found to be very threatening.
Looking at the state of Jerusalem’s eastern sector today, it is understandable why Israel would not want UNESCO or anyone else walking around the Old City, especially the Palestinian-populated parts of it. Because anyone who does, will see the devastation that Israel and its settlers have wreaked on one of the oldest and most beautiful cities in the world.
Excavation works are being conducted in and around the Aqsa Mosque to make way for more Jewish construction at the place where Waqf authorities say Ottoman and Abbasid artifacts have long been tucked away. A Muslim graveyard is being dug up just outside the Old City’s Jaffa Gate, to build – ironically – a museum of tolerance. Today, two stores were forcefully taken over by Jewish settlers in Al Hakari, one of the neighborhoods in the Muslim quarter and every day, it seems that more and more homes are either being demolished by Israeli municipality authorities or being taken over by Jewish settlers.
The “Judiazation” of Jerusalem is a term many Palestinians and Arabs use for what Israel is doing in the city. In a nutshell, it is the long-term plan Israel is gradually carrying out to change the Arab Palestinian character of Jerusalem. This means demolishing old and historical structures, displacing Palestinians, handing over their homes to settlers and trying to erase the Palestinian or Arab history of the city.
The sad truth is that, on the surface, Israel has succeeded in this to a large extent. Pockets of Jewish settlers now live in the heart of Muslim quarters and aim to take over more and more. Sheikh Jarrah, one of the more affluent Palestinian neighborhoods of Jerusalem, is now pierced with Jewish flags waving from homes that have been wrestled from their Palestinian owners, and Israel’s light rail train cuts right down through Palestinian neighborhoods outside of the city center. The train, of course, is not meant to service the Palestinian population but rather to connect Jewish neighborhoods and settlements in the city, but the area confiscated from Shufat and Beit Hanina for its construction simply fell into the plan.
What the UNESCO mission would not have seen even if they made it into the Old City is the overall humiliation that the Palestinian population of Jerusalem must endure on a daily basis because of Israel’s military occupation. Trips to the Israeli ministry of interior must be made just to prove that one lives in the city for fear that their residency rights may be revoked; young Palestinian men are stopped randomly by Israeli soldiers to check their ID cards or just to harass them, and settlers are always given the luxury of maximum security whenever they walk the streets. If settlers want to march through the city, the Palestinians are told to close their shops, are barred for hours from reaching their homes if they run along the path of the march and are always the ones blamed if any kind of confrontation between the two sides breaks out.
Jerusalem is being squeezed by these measures more and more each day. But there is always that glimmer of hope, that strength that shines through proving that all is not lost. On Shavuot, Israeli settlers and extremists poured into the Old City, singing loudly, banging on the shop doors and waving huge Israeli flags. The sight was disconcerting to say the least. However, the afternoon of that same day, at Damascus Gate, passersby were met with a completely different scene. Palestinian flags waved in determined Palestinian hands under the threatening eye of heavily armed Israeli police and soldiers. The youths were fearless, demanding freedom, with strong, unrelenting voices.
The sight of the Palestinian flag waving at the entrance to Damascus Gate was a breath of fresh air. All is not lost and never will be because hope is eternal and determination and strength come from a never-ending spring.
That day at Damascus Gate is what all Palestinians must keep in their minds’ eye in spite of the daily oppression of the occupation. No matter how many missions Israel bars from entering or how many houses it takes over, there will always be those brave souls who, despite the risks, will always raise Palestine’s flag.
Joharah Baker is a Writer for the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.
Let Mohammed rest in peace
Date posted: May 20, 2013
By Joharah Baker for MIFTAH
There is no point falling into the pit of countering the claims being made about the death of Mohammed Al Durra, the 12-year old boy from Gaza whose videotaped killing was seen around the world. The boy, crouching in fear behind is equally afraid father as bullets whizzed around them, was killed admittedly by the Israeli army. Later, the army recanted after investigating the tape, saying Durra was killed by Palestinian fire instead. Well now, Israel is changing its story altogether, saying he was not killed at all. In fact, he was probably not even wounded and the French channel that broadcast the footage and brought some pretty bad rap to Israel, had most likely filmed a charade.
The reason why I will not waste my time countering this claim is that even with the great lengths the Israeli government went to to prove that the boy was never killed, it could not provide any irrefutable proof that Mohammed Al Durra – who would be 25 now – is still alive. No pictures, no testimonies, no hospital or morgue officials giving statements to refute his death, have been provided. Only sketchy information about ‘poor quality footage’ and the fact that it seems as though the boy moved his arm after he had slumped over his father following the explosion.
My point is this: indeed, Mohammed Durra’s death was at least one of the catalysts that fueled the second Intifada, and thus, was an important event in the history of the Palestinians. However, more importantly – most importantly to me –is the fact that this is about a boy who died in sheer terror, with his distraught father futilely trying to shelter him from the barrage of bullets coming their way.
Mohammed Al Durra was a boy, with a life, a family and friends. He died a horrible death and now he is being made to die a second one. I did not know Mohammed or his family, but I can only imagine how awful it must be for them to read these claims now and feel the pain of losing their child all over again. If nothing else, this is disrespect for human life of the worst kind.
Some may postulate that the rehashing of the Durra case is a personal jab at the French cameraman who shot the footage, Charles Enderlin. Perhaps. But as a Palestinian who has seen the pain endured by numerous families who receive the horrible news that their sons or daughters have been killed by the Israeli army, my concern is for his family and for his memory. He should be left to rest in peace. If Israel has axes to grind with French journalists or with the international community for holding it accountable for its actions, then so be it. Israel is not lacking in the public relations department.
That being said, there is just one decent thing left to do. Leave Mohammed Al Durra and his memory alone.
Joharah Baker is a Writer for the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.
Recognition and justice is our demand
Date posted: May 13, 2013
By Joharah Baker for MIFTAH
This week Palestinians will commemorate Al Nakba, the catastrophe that befell the Palestinian people when Israel was founded. Every year, Palestinians hang placards pointing to the right of return, they carry keys symbolizing the homes they were forced to leave and could not return to and remember the Palestine that was lost to them 65 years ago.
This year will be no different. Every May 15, Palestinian recall their catastrophe and demand justice. They demand that they are granted the right of return for those who were made refugees virtually overnight and were then relegate to a life they did not choose. But more than anything, they demand recognition of the tragedy that befell them rather than a denial that it ever happened, or worse, that it was of their own making.
It has been 65 years since Israel was established in 1948, which means those who were cast into exile are either very old or have long passed. Those who experienced the Nakba are now few and far between, clinging to those few precious memories of a small garden in front of their house in Jaffa or of the salty smell of the sea in their neighborhood in Haifa. The rest of us are either descendants of these refugees or ordinary Palestinians who feel their cause is our cause because we are one people.
But the Palestinians have made one thing clear. The refugee issue will not die with the last refugee. It is felt nationwide, the loss, the injustice and the fact that those who were forced from their homes have mostly passed, longing for their beloved homes.
We cannot turn back time. What was lost has been altered, destroyed, changed or taken over by Israel’s newcomers. What we can do is hold on to the right to be recognized, for the injustice to be rectified in word and deed and for Palestine to never be lost in our minds or hearts.
Joharah Baker is a Writer for the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.
