In a recent article entitled “World Bank: Palestinians Should Pay for Israeli Checkpoints,” Emad Mekay uncovers a proposal by the World Bank which is in complete contravention to international and humanitarian law, any moral or ethical beliefs and, frankly, has no logical basis whatsoever. Initially, these statements might seem quite harsh; however, the reality of this proposal goes far beyond shocking audacity. In brief, this World Bank project proposes that the Palestinian National Authority pay for modernizing and updating illegal Israeli checkpoints, along the illegal Separation Wall, which is built on illegally occupied land, through so-called soft loans, in order to allow Palestinian goods and workers a faster review at checkpoints. For some cosmic reason, this proposal would help the Palestinian economy recover from its four and a half year slump.
Speaking to the International Press Service (IPS), Markus Kostner, the World Bank’s Country Programme Coordinator for the West Bank and Gaza said, “We had proposed a couple of crossings and Israel has more formally come back to us and asked whether we would help secure financing for these, which is why we have started to prepare a project.” The World Bank official then goes on to defend this proposal by saying “the project helps enhance the efficiency of the border crossings for the benefit of Palestinians…at least maintain if not increase the security considerations of Israelis. From that perspective it will be a double gain.”
To put these statements into any form of scientific context will be difficult. However, there are three realities that will hopefully prove that this proposed project is in fact an almost certain proposal for failure and injustice. The three parties concerned in this matter are the World Bank, the State of Israel and the Palestinian people, with their very limited Authority.
The World Bank, in essence, should be an impartial international development institution, working under the umbrella of the UN, conforming to its charter and, thereby, all international law deriving from it. As such, it has the legal obligation to:
- Promote international Peace and Security
- Assist nations in their task of economic and social development
The second party involved is the State of Israel (a member of the UN) which has, since its birth, been defiant towards any form of internationally regulated law and order. Since 1967 Israel illegally occupies Palestinian and Arab Land, maintains a continuous policy of building settlements on this land and, in recent years, has been building a Separation Wall on Palestinian land, virtually choking Palestinian people by the collar.
Then, there is Palestine, a nation which has yet to become a state, a people that have only known dispossession, oppression, occupation and racism as a form of rule. Palestinians, in reality, are reduced to nothing more than the receiving end of Israel’s illegal and prolonged occupation.
Bearing these realities in mind and context, it will be now possible to see what it is that infuriates Palestinians about the new world order they live in. In some respects, the recent statements by the World Bank and its proposal are the true embodiment of the failure of the international system. Instead of adhering to the International Court of Justice’s (another international body) advisory opinion on the Wall, which deems it illegal and calls on all states not to recognize the illegal situation resulting from the construction and, finally, not to render aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by such construction.
The World Bank miraculously ignores all of these crucial points, and instead proposes to update these checkpoints for the sake of Palestinian daily life. Such projects are hardly conducive to any peace efforts, let alone economic development; they are rather an endeavor at institutionalizing this illegal Separation Wall through international institutions, which will make the PNA pay for checkpoints in the future through soft loans, which are only soft in name but rough in interest rates and repercussions.
The Separation Wall, along with its checkpoints, are simply illegal, wrong and utterly counterproductive. Palestinians do not need or deserve more modern Israeli security facilities to travel within and through the Occupied Territories. The Palestinians, and for that matter the Israelis, do not need a Separation Wall for security. If true security and economic development are at the heart of the World Bank proposal, it would have to look much different. An acceptable proposal from an international development institution would initially have to call on Israel to stop construction of the Wall and dismantle the already upright slabs of concrete. Then with concerns to economic development, the relation between checkpoints and economic development is simply an inverse relationship. The checkpoints must go in order for the Palestinian economy to grow and mushroom.
Believing in Jerusalem
Date posted: May 27, 2013
By Joharah Baker for MIFTAH
Last week, Israel barred a UNESCO fact-finding mission from entering the country, charging that the Palestinians had ‘politicized’ the mission before it had even arrived. The mission was tasked with looking into conditions of historical sites in the Old City of Jerusalem, something Israel apparently found to be very threatening.
Looking at the state of Jerusalem’s eastern sector today, it is understandable why Israel would not want UNESCO or anyone else walking around the Old City, especially the Palestinian-populated parts of it. Because anyone who does, will see the devastation that Israel and its settlers have wreaked on one of the oldest and most beautiful cities in the world.
Excavation works are being conducted in and around the Aqsa Mosque to make way for more Jewish construction at the place where Waqf authorities say Ottoman and Abbasid artifacts have long been tucked away. A Muslim graveyard is being dug up just outside the Old City’s Jaffa Gate, to build – ironically – a museum of tolerance. Today, two stores were forcefully taken over by Jewish settlers in Al Hakari, one of the neighborhoods in the Muslim quarter and every day, it seems that more and more homes are either being demolished by Israeli municipality authorities or being taken over by Jewish settlers.
The “Judiazation” of Jerusalem is a term many Palestinians and Arabs use for what Israel is doing in the city. In a nutshell, it is the long-term plan Israel is gradually carrying out to change the Arab Palestinian character of Jerusalem. This means demolishing old and historical structures, displacing Palestinians, handing over their homes to settlers and trying to erase the Palestinian or Arab history of the city.
The sad truth is that, on the surface, Israel has succeeded in this to a large extent. Pockets of Jewish settlers now live in the heart of Muslim quarters and aim to take over more and more. Sheikh Jarrah, one of the more affluent Palestinian neighborhoods of Jerusalem, is now pierced with Jewish flags waving from homes that have been wrestled from their Palestinian owners, and Israel’s light rail train cuts right down through Palestinian neighborhoods outside of the city center. The train, of course, is not meant to service the Palestinian population but rather to connect Jewish neighborhoods and settlements in the city, but the area confiscated from Shufat and Beit Hanina for its construction simply fell into the plan.
What the UNESCO mission would not have seen even if they made it into the Old City is the overall humiliation that the Palestinian population of Jerusalem must endure on a daily basis because of Israel’s military occupation. Trips to the Israeli ministry of interior must be made just to prove that one lives in the city for fear that their residency rights may be revoked; young Palestinian men are stopped randomly by Israeli soldiers to check their ID cards or just to harass them, and settlers are always given the luxury of maximum security whenever they walk the streets. If settlers want to march through the city, the Palestinians are told to close their shops, are barred for hours from reaching their homes if they run along the path of the march and are always the ones blamed if any kind of confrontation between the two sides breaks out.
Jerusalem is being squeezed by these measures more and more each day. But there is always that glimmer of hope, that strength that shines through proving that all is not lost. On Shavuot, Israeli settlers and extremists poured into the Old City, singing loudly, banging on the shop doors and waving huge Israeli flags. The sight was disconcerting to say the least. However, the afternoon of that same day, at Damascus Gate, passersby were met with a completely different scene. Palestinian flags waved in determined Palestinian hands under the threatening eye of heavily armed Israeli police and soldiers. The youths were fearless, demanding freedom, with strong, unrelenting voices.
The sight of the Palestinian flag waving at the entrance to Damascus Gate was a breath of fresh air. All is not lost and never will be because hope is eternal and determination and strength come from a never-ending spring.
That day at Damascus Gate is what all Palestinians must keep in their minds’ eye in spite of the daily oppression of the occupation. No matter how many missions Israel bars from entering or how many houses it takes over, there will always be those brave souls who, despite the risks, will always raise Palestine’s flag.
Joharah Baker is a Writer for the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.
Let Mohammed rest in peace
Date posted: May 20, 2013
By Joharah Baker for MIFTAH
There is no point falling into the pit of countering the claims being made about the death of Mohammed Al Durra, the 12-year old boy from Gaza whose videotaped killing was seen around the world. The boy, crouching in fear behind is equally afraid father as bullets whizzed around them, was killed admittedly by the Israeli army. Later, the army recanted after investigating the tape, saying Durra was killed by Palestinian fire instead. Well now, Israel is changing its story altogether, saying he was not killed at all. In fact, he was probably not even wounded and the French channel that broadcast the footage and brought some pretty bad rap to Israel, had most likely filmed a charade.
The reason why I will not waste my time countering this claim is that even with the great lengths the Israeli government went to to prove that the boy was never killed, it could not provide any irrefutable proof that Mohammed Al Durra – who would be 25 now – is still alive. No pictures, no testimonies, no hospital or morgue officials giving statements to refute his death, have been provided. Only sketchy information about ‘poor quality footage’ and the fact that it seems as though the boy moved his arm after he had slumped over his father following the explosion.
My point is this: indeed, Mohammed Durra’s death was at least one of the catalysts that fueled the second Intifada, and thus, was an important event in the history of the Palestinians. However, more importantly – most importantly to me –is the fact that this is about a boy who died in sheer terror, with his distraught father futilely trying to shelter him from the barrage of bullets coming their way.
Mohammed Al Durra was a boy, with a life, a family and friends. He died a horrible death and now he is being made to die a second one. I did not know Mohammed or his family, but I can only imagine how awful it must be for them to read these claims now and feel the pain of losing their child all over again. If nothing else, this is disrespect for human life of the worst kind.
Some may postulate that the rehashing of the Durra case is a personal jab at the French cameraman who shot the footage, Charles Enderlin. Perhaps. But as a Palestinian who has seen the pain endured by numerous families who receive the horrible news that their sons or daughters have been killed by the Israeli army, my concern is for his family and for his memory. He should be left to rest in peace. If Israel has axes to grind with French journalists or with the international community for holding it accountable for its actions, then so be it. Israel is not lacking in the public relations department.
That being said, there is just one decent thing left to do. Leave Mohammed Al Durra and his memory alone.
Joharah Baker is a Writer for the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.
Recognition and justice is our demand
Date posted: May 13, 2013
By Joharah Baker for MIFTAH
This week Palestinians will commemorate Al Nakba, the catastrophe that befell the Palestinian people when Israel was founded. Every year, Palestinians hang placards pointing to the right of return, they carry keys symbolizing the homes they were forced to leave and could not return to and remember the Palestine that was lost to them 65 years ago.
This year will be no different. Every May 15, Palestinian recall their catastrophe and demand justice. They demand that they are granted the right of return for those who were made refugees virtually overnight and were then relegate to a life they did not choose. But more than anything, they demand recognition of the tragedy that befell them rather than a denial that it ever happened, or worse, that it was of their own making.
It has been 65 years since Israel was established in 1948, which means those who were cast into exile are either very old or have long passed. Those who experienced the Nakba are now few and far between, clinging to those few precious memories of a small garden in front of their house in Jaffa or of the salty smell of the sea in their neighborhood in Haifa. The rest of us are either descendants of these refugees or ordinary Palestinians who feel their cause is our cause because we are one people.
But the Palestinians have made one thing clear. The refugee issue will not die with the last refugee. It is felt nationwide, the loss, the injustice and the fact that those who were forced from their homes have mostly passed, longing for their beloved homes.
We cannot turn back time. What was lost has been altered, destroyed, changed or taken over by Israel’s newcomers. What we can do is hold on to the right to be recognized, for the injustice to be rectified in word and deed and for Palestine to never be lost in our minds or hearts.
Joharah Baker is a Writer for the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.
