MIFTAH
Wednesday, 3 July. 2024
 
Your Key to Palestine
The Palestinian Initiatives for The Promotoion of Global Dialogue and Democracy
 
 
 

New Page 1

It has now been a hundred days since Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas assumed office, succeeding the historic, symbolic leadership of the late Yasser Arafat. Much analysis of Abbas’s performance thus far has focused on his strength and ability to bring sustainable peace to the region, unlike his predecessor. Analysts have stressed the lack of immediate change, accusing Abbas of not fighting corruption, or forcefully dismantling armed Palestinian resistance groups or improving the daily lives of Palestinians. However, such scrutiny is very narrow and short-sighted. How much can one man really accomplish? And how much of this responsibility solely belongs to one man?

Since taking office over three months ago, Abbas has made attempts to negotiate with Israel peacefully and to clean up the corruption in the Palestinian government—slowly but surely. He has fired and replaced several top security officials, restructured the security service, appointed new faces to his cabinet, ordered investigations of corruption, initiated laws to disarm resistance groups and forged a formal ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian resistance groups.

However, there is an inherent problem that serves as an obstacle to a full-scale turnover. Some of these officials and proceedings operate under a long-established system of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, which has given them tremendous power. And many of these officials have very loyal followers who seek to maintain a powerful presence and influence by any means necessary, including violence. Not only does fighting and breaking down such conditions pose a threat of personal danger, but it also threatens the breakout of chaos. In order for Abbas and the Palestinian National Authority to achieve success and legitimacy in such matters, it has to be careful in dealing with a highly sensitive population with immense emotional approaches to its fight for freedom and self-determination. Balance is key.

Furthermore, these problems exist aside from the fact that Israel has done little, if anything at all, to ease the restrictions and tensions caused by its illegal occupation of Palestinian territories, including settlement expansion, construction of the Separation Wall and unabated killings of Palestinians. Its supposed military withdrawals from Jericho and Tulkarem were merely a publicity move, in which the checkpoints were only moved further away from the city borders. Its release of 500 Palestinian prisoners was of those whose sentences were already up or of those who should not have been in detention in the first place; approximately 7,000 Palestinians remain in Israeli custody with no progress on negotiating further releases. And Israel has given no credit to Abbas for the ceasefire and has actually criticized him for not dismantling the armed resistance groups. At the same time, it is Israel who has violated the ceasefire on 3,250 accounts as of early April. So where is proof of Sharon’s efforts, commitments and responsibility to peace?

Israel and the international community seem to have very high expectations of a government that does not even have an official state and which suffers a brutal occupation. The PNA is also trying to operate under a vast, and sometimes contradictory, set of laws and procedures aside from its own, including Israel’s ever-changing military orders, as well as international laws, treaties and agreements not adhered to or enforced.

Thus, Abbas and the PNA are trying to swim in a political whirlpool of uncertainty, contradiction, corruption, tradition, occupation, violence and religion. Steps toward stability in Palestine need to be taken slowly and cautiously. Israel and international leaders should temper the criticism and, rather, encourage, support and assist the PNA in its efforts to organize the Palestinian government and society. Granted, there are problems that the PNA must face and address with greater intensity, but cutting off relations and punishing them for “insufficient” progress is unfair and counterproductive. If Israel is yet to be held accountable for progress toward peace after fifty-eight years of an unjust and oppressive conflict, then it can afford to give the Palestinians more than a hundred days to establish a firm and stable government.

 
 
Read More...
 
Footer
Contact us
Rimawi Bldg, 3rd floor
14 Emil Touma Street,
Al Massayef, Ramallah
Postalcode P6058131

Mailing address:
P.O.Box 69647
Jerusalem
 
 
Palestine
972-2-298 9490/1
972-2-298 9492
info@miftah.org

 
All Rights Reserved © Copyright,MIFTAH 2023
Subscribe to MIFTAH's mailing list
* indicates required