Something deep and painful was broken in Ramallah this week: along with the bones broken by violent Palestinian plainclothes and official security officials dealing with a protest, Palestinian trust was permanently wounded.
The protests were called for by non-partisan youth protesting the intended, unprecedented, visit by the Israeli vice premier, Shaul Mofaz, to Ramallah. Palestinian protesters made a strong argument for their opposition to the Mofaz visit. They explained that Mofaz cannot make it to many countries around the world because of his role in executing war crimes against Palestinians, including the killings in Jenin and the crimes that took place during the Israeli armyís reoccupation of major West Bank cities in 2002. They also accused Mofaz of assassinating PFLP leader Mustafa Abu Ali and Hamasí handicapped leader Ahmad Yassin, and of the imprisonment of Fateh leader Marwan Barghouthi.
The Mofaz visit was eventually called off, but the demonstration continued and was met with a violent crackdown. It is unclear why the visit was cancelled. Israeli media talked about conflicts within the Israeli government, while Palestinian leaders tried to take credit for the cancellation.
Regardless of the reason, the violent attacks against protesters brought to the front images of the Arab Spring. The acts of plainclothes security under the eyes of the head of the Ramallah police reminded many of similar attempts by thugs and shabiha in various Arab countries.
The scores of injured in the July 1 demonstration triggered a second demonstration the following day, in protest of the crackdown, and again Palestinian security used violence to prevent hundreds of demonstrators from reaching the Palestinian Authorityís Muqata headquarters.
While the successive crackdowns received minor coverage in the Palestinian press, and even on some of the most read websites, the news and pictures of Palestinian violence trended on social media. To her credit, the PLO executive committee member Hanan Ashrawi was among the first to publicly denounce the violence against nonviolent protesters.
It took Palestinian human rights organisation and civil society groups a few days to gather the evidence and issue a strong statement of protest.
Eventually the Palestinian minister of interior issued a statement saying that an investigation will be conducted into what happened. Few Palestinians trust such statement, based on previous promises when investigations either never took place or the results were not made public.
The Palestinian leadershipís apparent impunity increased the attacks by many of its opponents who accuse it of being out of touch with the Palestinian reality and changing political landscape. Palestinian leaders deal with protests according to the ideology of the party they belong to, rather than as an inalienable right to express freely.
Traditionally, the Fateh-dominated Palestinian security leadership is tolerant of protests initiated by one of the PLO factions. Even Hamas-led protests are usually tolerated because of the fear that Hamas leaders might take revenge on Fateh cadres in Gaza.
The fact that the latest protests came from young people that do not belong to either PLO factions or Hamas seems to have made the security apparatus feel that it can act with impunity against them. This has proved to be a mistake and if it continues, it will bring long-term damage to the Fateh leadership.
It is unlikely that the current protests will produce anything close to the two intifadas that shook the earth of the occupiers. If anything, the current protests and the dynamism created by the securityís crackdown will produce large protests against the Palestinian Authority.
Palestinian resentment at the unending West Bank-Gaza split and the disgust with the negotiation process will most likely lead to a strengthening of this popular anti-PA movement. And if the demands and aspirations of these protesters are not taken seriously, the very foundation and legitimacy of the current Palestinian leadership will be seriously put to test.
The Arab Spring might have taken some time to reach Palestine, but as one Arab leader said, spring is a season that comes back every year.
For a long time Palestinians were willing to put aside differences because of the need to unite against the Israeli occupier, which does not differentiate between Palestinians. However, more and more Palestinians are becoming convinced that their acquiescence to and support for the current Palestinian leadership should not be taken for granted.
The bones that were broken in Ramallah this week will take long to heal. The political hurt is likely to be felt much after the physical injury heals. The faster this issue is taken seriously the better for all.